Skip to content
Slot Global Magazine

Could Additional Countries Pursue Australia's Example in Prohibiting Online Networks for Under-16s?

Australia's decisive move to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and guardians are watching intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for other nations.

Across Europe Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising number of countries are moving toward comparable restrictions.

  • The Danish government plans a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and networks are "stealing our kids' childhood". A law may be passed in the coming year.
  • Norway is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to shield children from the "influence of the algorithms".
  • The Irish government is working on a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "an measures on the table".
  • In Spain, the president has called on lawmakers to approve a law raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
  • In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has endorsed a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
  • The government in The Netherlands has urged guardians to block their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding statement demanding a ban for minors unless parental consent is granted. While it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the resolution does not create enforceable legislation.

"An effective age limit is a good first step," stated one MEP behind the initiative.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Approach

For the United Kingdom, the government has not ruled out a future ban, emphasizing that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any action must be "supported by conclusive evidence".

Last year, momentum built behind a legislative effort to impose controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually weakened. However, the administration committed to further research the topic.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. An organization set up by the family of a young person who died after being exposed to harmful social media material suggests that a strict age ban could fail to improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of risk when young people turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the refusal of the social media companies to design platforms and apps that are secure and suitable for young users," said a leading peer.

America: A State-by-State Picture

In the United States, regulation is mostly happening at the local level against a backdrop of national inaction.

  • The state of Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
  • Florida has enacted a bill barring under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
  • The state of Virginia has enacted a law capping minors to one hour of social media time per day, with extra use dependent on adult consent.
  • Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted bills demanding guardian approval for under-16s to create social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from various individuals to copy this example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Perspectives

Beyond the West, further nations are also taking action.

  • The Malaysian government aims to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
  • The Brazilian authorities has raised the required age for one major platform to 16.

However, world bodies strike a more nuanced position. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans have downsides and "may even backfire". The organization notes that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

While this global conversation unfolds, the policies of the Australian government and several other countries demonstrate that policymakers globally are no longer prepared to delay for platforms to self-regulate.

Written by

Diamond Garcia

A seasoned gaming journalist with over a decade of experience covering online casinos and slot innovations across Europe.

Slot Global Magazine

Type to search articles.